Archives for posts with tag: inspiration

sorting through my books, i found an old notebook of mine that had fallen behind the shelf. in it, i read lines i’d copied four years ago from books about and by tibetan yogis, from milan kundera’s immortality; i am stirred, as i was when i first encountered these words and was moved to put pen to paper.

“one night toward the end of her life orgyan chokyi had a dream in which her close friend ani kunga drolma came to visit her. she took the hermitess by the hand, implored her to be happy, and disappeared. kunga drolma’s dream visitation was not to keep orgyan chokyi happy. she was visited by the ‘great impermanence’ that so concerned her in earlier years. yet this time it was her memory of people now gone that brought her to contemplate the stark reality of suffering that lies at the heart of buddhist understandings of life. as she contemplated her past, ‘little by little all those people who had died in all the tibetan valleys were set in a row in my memory.’ her response to this vision was grim, darkly illustrating the life’s rhetoric of suffering: ‘i tried to count them, but was unable.” -himalayan hermitess

if you recognize yourself, you are a nun.
if you realize unborn emptiness, you are a woman of intelligence.
if you can sleep alone without friends, you are a clever woman.
if you wander the empty unpeopled valley, you are a heroine,
if you quel mistaken appearances and self-grasping, you are a dakini.
-orgyan tenzin

“how, understanding that worldly things are without essence, i left home for the homeless life.”
“be always a child of the mountains: wear mist as a robe, a rocky cape as a cap.”
-the life of shabkar

the purpose of the poetry is not to try to dazzle us with an astonishing thought, but to make one moment of existence unforgettable and worthy of unbearable nostalgia.

her memories of that time and of that motorcycle mingled with her memories of rimbaud: he was their poet… rimbaud, who had commanded everyone to be absolutely modern, was a poet of nature, a wanderer, and his poetry contained words that modern man had forgotten or no longer knew how to savor: crickets, elms, watercress, hazel trees, lime trees, heather, oak, delightful ravens, warm droppings of ancient dovecotes; and above all roads, roads and paths.

dramatic tension is the real curse of the novel, because it transforms everything, even the most beautiful pages, even the most surprising scenes and observations merely into steps leading to the final resolution, in which everything that preceded is concentrated.


Roland Barthes, Paris, 1979. Photograph: Fabian Cevallos/Corbis

The Neutral doesn’t refer to ‘impressions’ of grayness, of ‘neutrality,’ of indifference. The Neutral–my Neutral… is an ardent, burning activity. (7)
To read the dead author is, for me, to be alive, for I am shattered, torn by the awareness of the contradiction between the intense life of his text and the sadness of knowing he is dead… to mourn is to be alive. (10)
I want to live according to nuance. Now, there is a teacher of nuance, literature; try to live according to the nuances that literature teaches me (“My tongue on his skin=/my lips on his hand”) (11)
The desire for Neutral is desire for: –first suspension (epoche) of orders, laws, summons, arrogances, terrorisms, puttings on notice, the will-to-possess. –then, by way of deepening, refusal of pure discourse of opposition… (12)
The desire for Neutral continually stages a paradox: as an object, the Neutral means suspension of violence; as a desire, it means violence… there is a violence of the Neutral but this violence is inexpressible (13)
It matters little to me to know if God exists or not; but what I know and will know to the end is that He shouldn’t have simultaneously created love and death. The Neutral is this irreducible No: a No so to speak suspended in front of the hardenings of both faith and certitude and incorruptible by either one. (14)
Blanchot’s (weary!) cry: “I don’t ask that weariness be done away with. I ask to be led back to a region where it might be possible to be weary.” (17)
Weariness=an intensity: society doesn’t recognize intensities (18)
Weariness: the demand for a position. The present-day world is full of it (statements, manifestos, petitions, etc.), and it’s why it is so wearisome: hard to float, to shift places. (However, to float, ie, to live in a space without tying oneself to a place=the most relaxing position of the body: bath, boat.) (19)
(On silence) The moon turned invisible at its waning, the bud or the tendril that hasn’t yet opened up, the egg that is not yet hatched: silet, sileunt. …This “silence” of nautre draws near Boehme’s mystical vision of God. (22)